thatsprettysicknasty:

angeldictator:

Not elegant enough to be a vampire…. . not jock enough to be a werewolf.. ..

goblin it is

mautlin:

mautlin:

are people who believe the word “straight” was created to “slur heterosexuals” somehow not aware of the extremely prevalent meaning of “straight” in the past to mean clean, proper, not on drugs, not involved in crime, not “bent” (used to mean gay), just a normal, respectable dude on a correct life path… like that’s what people meant when they said “he’s straight” before it became almost exclusively a sexual orientation term. they just meant he’s normal 

however, I do think we as a community should come up with some terms to slur heterosexuals

thefingerfuckingfemalefury:

chromaslip:

blackberrywidow:

science-husband:

loki-tony-peter:

peterssquill:

peterssquill:

thor would be pissed that he missed the dinosaurs tbh 

thor: you have 7 phds, can you find a way to resurrect them?
bruce: there’s literally six movies proving what a terrible idea that is
thor: you don’t have all the facts
bruce: which are?
thor: i love them 

Wait if the Jurassic Park movies exist in the MCU… I want Thor to watch them with Bruce and ask why the Grandmaster is in them. Bruce is confused but looks at who Thor is pointing at before just… “holy shit…”

*Bruce 3 hours later*

Bruce: Tony listen! Geff Goldbloom is an immortal alien god! Tony where are you going? Come back! This is important!

Tony the next time he sees Jeff Goldbloom at a party: Oh man, you won’t believe what my buddy told me the other day. He thinks you’re some kind of immortal alien god and that you held him prisoner in space. Can you believe that? Wild.

Jeff:

Originally posted by trapstrblog

@thefingerfuckingfemalefury

Headline: Tony Stark Found Dead After Leaving Party

Jeff Goldblum claims he saw him leave with “Handsome but deceitful bearded Asgardian with sparkly fingers who probably killed him”

devinwolfi:

Thor and Hannah Montana are in-laws

bargareanjade:

benyw:

despaclito:

alliluyevas:

alliluyevas:

National Geographic on Facebook: this is a facial reconstruction of a teenage girl who lived 9000 years ago based on her remains!

half the comments: men criticizing her looks and saying she’s unattractive and mannish

anyway this is the reconstruction and I always enjoy seeing the faces of prehistoric humans and how much we have in common over thousands of years despite how incredibly different our lives are. I support her and I think she looks wonderful.

everyone in the replies of this post saying “well I think she’s pretty!” missed the whole damn point lmao

I remember watching a documentary once where historians were trying to work out who a dead girl was and what her life was like. I’m pretty sure they dated the body back to the early Victorian era, and established pretty early on that she lived in poverty, died young, and was most certainly a prostitute.

The grand finale of the show was the reveal of her reconstructed face. Now, bare in mind that through their investigations they discovered that she had lived an awful life and died an agonizing death (syphilis iirc). So, you can imagine my disgust when the historians reacted with disappointment at the reveal of her ‘face’. This poor girl, who had suffered terribly, was obviously not the poor, tragic beauty they had been hoping for.

She was plain, maybe some would say she was ugly, but what was truly hideous was the fact that you could practically see the sympathy these historians had for this poor girl slip away as they looked at her ‘face’, and you could certainly hear it in their voices.

Even in death our value rests on the basis of our looks. Sympathy is conditional - based on where you fall on the looks scale.

Science: *gives us the miracle of seeing long-dead faces*

Men: